🔗 Share this article

A veteran Federal Bureau of Investigation operative has filed legal action claiming he was let go for having an LGBTQ+ banner at his office space.

Based on David Maltinsky, that served in the agency over a decade and a half, his dismissal in the past months was “improper and biased”.

Court Proceedings Alleges First Amendment Breaches

The complaint states that the FBI infringed upon the plaintiff’s free speech rights and took punitive action against him because of engaging in legally safeguarded speech.

Maltinsky is seeking a legal ruling to return his position at the bureau.

Particulars in the Complaint

The detailed complaint, filed in federal court for the District of Columbia, claims that Maltinsky was dismissed from the Quantico facility last month over before displaying the banner in his workspace.

As stated in the filing, the LGBTQ+ banner was awarded to the employee to acknowledge his work to support the bureau’s inclusion programs.

Since childhood, my only desire has been to serve the United States and ensure its security beside the brilliant and dedicated personnel at the agency,” remarked the former employee.

He continued, I exhibited that symbol – which once was displayed at a federal building – not to make a political point, but as a representation of inclusion, unity and equal service.

“These are the values that previously strengthened the FBI strong. Today it has become where people like me face discrimination. I believe I was dismissed not due to who I am, but what I am: a homosexual man,” he said.

Abrupt Firing Just ahead of Finish

Recently, the plaintiff gained admission to the federal agent course in Virginia, until what he described as “unexpected firing just three weeks before graduation”.

The filing additionally states that eventually subsequent to the presidential inauguration, an colleague reported an alleged concern to his manager regarding the presence of the rainbow banner.

To be safe, the plaintiff sought that the Chief Division Counsel for the local bureau assess whether the exhibition of the symbol was permissible,” the complaint noted.

It further mentioned, “The Chief Division Counsel advised the plaintiff that showing of the flag was not against any policy, rule, or regulation.”

Informing of Firing

Despite this, on 1 October, Maltinsky was notified of his termination.

In correspondence cited in the complaint, bureau chief the official commented, “I have determined that you demonstrated poor judgment with an inappropriate display of a partisan emblem in your work area during your previous assignment in Los Angeles.

“Pursuant to the Constitution of the Constitution, and statutes of the United States, your job at the bureau is now ended.”

Legal Statement

In a release provided recently, his legal representative his counsel stated, The current leadership’s illegal termination forms part of a larger campaign to remove government departments of employees that possess divergent opinions, or belong to underrepresented communities, or who dare speak out against discrimination.

His case goes beyond his situation, but involves protecting the liberties and protections of all public servants.”

Agency Reaction

The bureau did not provide a statement regarding the case.

Related Lawsuits

This legal action is subsequent to a separate case lodged recently by previous high-level bureau employees that claimed they were wrongfully terminated.

They alleged that the director stated he had been directed by the president’s office to fire any employee associated with an investigation concerning Donald Trump.

Meanwhile, the bureau terminated a long-serving employee in November after the official allegedly grew upset by reports that the FBI director used a government jet to attend a sports event during which his partner sang the anthem.

The official, a bureau veteran since 1998, was removed as head of the agency’s response team, which manages serious incidents and the agency’s jet fleet.